<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Something old, something new &#8211; design patterns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justwriteclick.com/2007/11/16/something-old-something-new-design-patterns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justwriteclick.com/2007/11/16/something-old-something-new-design-patterns/</link>
	<description>Documentation as conversation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: annegentle</title>
		<link>http://justwriteclick.com/2007/11/16/something-old-something-new-design-patterns/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>annegentle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justwriteclick.com/2007/11/16/something-old-something-new-design-patterns/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Hi Cat, excellent perspective and it seems like there are two camps - one wants DITA-based standards, the other wants wikis with embedded video (in fact I just commented on the Wiki as forum, FAQ, HTML editor, XML editor, or CMS? post about such a thing.)

It&#039;s as if in my work life, I&#039;m seeking standards as a way to wrangle an Author-it database with 20,000 objects in it... but in my volunteer work with OLPC, I&#039;m constantly seeking wiki-based doc with video and images-only to communicate concepts. What a dichotomy!

So, I hope that there are accommodations for new technologies, but there will be mashups along the way where you simply guide your team that &quot;video is procedure only, never concept&quot; and that&#039;s that. I believe even with mashups like video in wiki, you could apply patterns to assist with consistency so that user&#039;s expectations are met when they click an  embedded video.

That might make no sense whatsoever when I read it tomorrow, but it sounds good this bright November morning in Austin. Thanks for making me think hard about all of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cat, excellent perspective and it seems like there are two camps &#8211; one wants DITA-based standards, the other wants wikis with embedded video (in fact I just commented on the Wiki as forum, FAQ, HTML editor, XML editor, or CMS? post about such a thing.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as if in my work life, I&#8217;m seeking standards as a way to wrangle an Author-it database with 20,000 objects in it&#8230; but in my volunteer work with OLPC, I&#8217;m constantly seeking wiki-based doc with video and images-only to communicate concepts. What a dichotomy!</p>
<p>So, I hope that there are accommodations for new technologies, but there will be mashups along the way where you simply guide your team that &#8220;video is procedure only, never concept&#8221; and that&#8217;s that. I believe even with mashups like video in wiki, you could apply patterns to assist with consistency so that user&#8217;s expectations are met when they click an  embedded video.</p>
<p>That might make no sense whatsoever when I read it tomorrow, but it sounds good this bright November morning in Austin. Thanks for making me think hard about all of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://justwriteclick.com/2007/11/16/something-old-something-new-design-patterns/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justwriteclick.com/2007/11/16/something-old-something-new-design-patterns/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Thanks for another thought-provoking entry.

Personally, I worry that things like industry-wide standards will end up holding us back in the long run.

While some of us focus on the anatomy of a how to, others are finding out that all our topic taxonomies converge with a single 15-second embedded video. It&#039;s a How to. No, it&#039;s a marketing piece. No, it&#039;s conceptual. No, it&#039;s an example.

I&#039;m guessing there are accommodations for new technologies, but I didn&#039;t see them in my quick read of your links. I look forward to hearing more as you explore it all.

Meanwhile, thanks for the grasshopper article!

Cheers,
Cat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for another thought-provoking entry.</p>
<p>Personally, I worry that things like industry-wide standards will end up holding us back in the long run.</p>
<p>While some of us focus on the anatomy of a how to, others are finding out that all our topic taxonomies converge with a single 15-second embedded video. It&#8217;s a How to. No, it&#8217;s a marketing piece. No, it&#8217;s conceptual. No, it&#8217;s an example.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing there are accommodations for new technologies, but I didn&#8217;t see them in my quick read of your links. I look forward to hearing more as you explore it all.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, thanks for the grasshopper article!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Cat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
